Posted: 2008-07-21 04:49
ATTENTION READERS!
We would like to point out a calculation error in the Petrol V Diesel article, ‘A matter of refinement’ (Issue 122). Referring to the claim that it was more expensive to run a diesel than a petrol, “…It would mean that a diesel owner would pay an extra $1009 a year in fuel.” Based on the fuel economy figures outlined in the article, the diesel would actually be the cheaper of the two in fuel costs each year by $254. Who ever said that calculators are easy to use?

While the diesel is obviously the more fuel efficient vehicle of the two, if you take into account the initial purchase difference it would take a diesel Sorento owner nearly 14 years to break even with the petrol counterpart. That’s not even taking into consideration the fact that servicing costs are also more expensive for the diesel. By that reasoning it is hardly an exercise in saving money when you buy a diesel these days with the price of fuel the way it is. On the other hand, we don’t want to sound like we are ‘diesel bashing’ as there’s no substitution for them in the 4WD world and in the Aussie bush. This is merely an exercise in bean counting.
Sorry if we had mislead anyone, we can assure you that we will continue to keep striving to bring you the quality no-bull journalism 4WD Action has built a reputation on doing and will do our best to make sure any blunders like that are caught before they go to print.
As the petrol versus diesel argument often sparks a lot of debate amongst us 4WDers, let us know what you think by commenting below.
- Shaun Whale










