35s fuel ecconomy difference?

philipjkennedy
Here and there
Posts: 25
Joined: May 4th, 2013, 5:38 pm

35s fuel ecconomy difference?

Unread post by philipjkennedy » June 5th, 2015, 9:16 pm

I'm running a LC200 2009 Sahara with 33inch Cooper ST MAXXs. I get about 11.2L/100 on long highway trips and about 13.8-14.5L/100 around town. It's unlocked with no chip but does have an aftermarket exhaust and liftkit.

I'm thinking of going to 35s on my next set of shoes (possibly a MT MTZs). Does anyone here have any idea what the effect on fuel economy would be?
Peace

vk3aif
Been here a while
Posts: 497
Joined: October 8th, 2011, 7:56 pm
Location: Melton, VIC

Re: 35s fuel ecconomy difference?

Unread post by vk3aif » June 6th, 2015, 1:04 am

About 6% if going by trip computor or odometer/tripmeter.
If measured accurately hardly anything.

bfg4
Getting to know the place
Posts: 16
Joined: July 22nd, 2007, 4:52 pm

Re: 35s fuel ecconomy difference?

Unread post by bfg4 » June 16th, 2015, 1:31 pm

Hey, what kind of lift are you running to fit 33's or 35's?

philipjkennedy
Here and there
Posts: 25
Joined: May 4th, 2013, 5:38 pm

Re: 35s fuel ecconomy difference?

Unread post by philipjkennedy » December 7th, 2015, 9:12 pm

@bfg4 just a normal 2inch lift with 33s
Peace

Return to “200 Series”